Tuesday 12 September 2017

THE ORAL APPROACH AND SITUATIONAL LANGUAGE TEACHING

              In the year of 1920 and 1930 a number of outstanding applied linguists developed the basis for a principled approach to methodology in language teaching. Harold Palmer and A. S. Hornby are two of the most prominent figures in British twentieth-century language teaching. They developed a more scientific foundation for an oral approach to teaching English than which Direct Method evidence. Palmer (1917, 1921) said that the result of oral approach was a systematic study of the principles and procedures which could be applied to the selection of the language course content.
            The important term in this approach is vocabulary aspect. It happens from two historical basic. First there was a general consensus among language teaching specialists, such as Palmer said that vocabulary is the important aspect for learning foreign language. Second influence, we can see the statement from Michael West (1920) “reading skills as the goal of foreign language study in some countries”.
            It is still parallel to the interest in developing rational principles for vocabulary selection was a focus on the grammatical content of a language course. Palmer’s view of grammar was very different from the model of Grammar Translation Method. Palmer viewed grammar as the underlying sentence patterns of the spoken language. In this approach, basic grammatical patterns were taught through an oral approach. Palmer, Hornby and other British scientist stated that major grammatical structure was important to produce sentence pattern which could be used to help internalize the rules of English sentence structure. In addition, they conclude that Speech was regarded as the basis of language, and structure was viewed as being at the heart of speaking ability.
            The main characteristics of the approach were as follows:
1.      Language teaching begins with the spoken language. Material is taught orally before it is presented in written form.
2.      The target language is the language of the classroom.
3.      New language points are introduced and practiced situationally.
4.      Vocabulary selection procedures are followed to ensure that an essential general service vocabulary is covered.
5.      Items of grammar are graded following the principle that simple forms should be taught before complex ones.
6.      Reading and writing are introduced once a sufficient lexical and grammatical basis is established.
In the teacher role, teacher gets the most important role for reach the goal of this approach. In the presentation stage of the lesson, the teacher serves as a model, setting up situation in which the need for the target structure is created and then modeling the new structure for students to repeat. Byrne (1976: 2) analogized the teacher becomes more like the skillful conductor of an orchestra, drawing the music out of the performers. The teacher is required to be a skillful manipulator, using questions, commands, and other cues to elicit correct sentences from the learners. Lessons are hence teacher directed, and the teacher sets the pace.
The procedure of language teaching and learning is varying according to the classroom level. However in every level has one goal, which is to move from controlled to free practice of structures and from oral use of sentence patterns to their automatic use in speech, reading, and writing. Pittman gives an example of a typical lesson plan: pronunciation, revision, presentation, oral practice (drilling), and reading of material on the new structure, or written exercises.
Davies et al. (1975: 6- 7) likewise give detailed information about teaching procedures to be used with Situational Language Teaching. The sequence of activities they propose consists of:
1.      Listening practice in which the teacher obtains his student's attention and repeats an example of the patterns or a word in isolation clearly, several times, probably saying it.
2.      Students all together or in large groups repeat what the teacher has said.
3.      Individual imitation in which the teacher asks several individual students to repeat the model he has given in order to check their pronunciation.
4.      Isolation, in which the teacher isolates sounds, words or groups of words which cause trouble and goes through techniques 1-3
5.      Building up to a new model, in which the teacher gets students to. ask and answer questions using patterns they already know in order to bring about the information necessary to introduce the new model.
6.      Elicitation, in which the teacher, using mime, prompt words, gestures, gets students to ask questions, make statements, or give new examples of the pattern.
7.      Substitution drilling, in which the teacher uses cue words (words, pictures, numbers, names) to get individual students to mix the examples of the new patterns.
8.      Question-answer drilling, in which the teacher gets one student to ask a question and another to answer until most students in the class have practiced asking and answering the new question form.
9.      Correction in which the teacher indicates by shaking his head, repeating the error, etc., that there is a mistake and invites the student or a different student to correct it. Where possible the teacher does not simply correct the mistake himself. He gets students to correct themselves so they will be Encouraged to listen to each other carefully.

The answer of critical questions:
1.      Pronunciation is taught directly in the first meeting of teaching and learning process. The pupils are listening from the teacher said then repeat what the teacher said. While the vocabulary is the important aspect of this approach. By master the vocabulary need in the material, students can speak and practice orally or written in this approach. Basic grammatical patterns were taught through an oral approach. The major grammatical structure was important to produce sentence pattern which could be used to help internalize the rules of English sentence structure.
By master pronounciation, vocabulary and basic grammatical need in the material, Pendulum is swinging and the pupils can reach the communication of language.
2.      There is no specific procedure for changing from spoken language to written language. This approach concerns to orally language, to communicate what new language acquired from the pupils.
3.      For spoken language, this approach is effective enough because new vocabulary, pronunciation and basic grammatical pattern in the material are taught in the first meeting. If teaching vocabulary, pronunciation and grammar pattern is successful, the goal of spoken language is easy to reach.
4.      In my opinion, this approach is effective enough for teaching spoken language, but it’s less in reaching the written language goal.